경기도농업기술원
Gyeonggi Agricultural Research & Extension Services, Yeoncheon 11003, Korea JFIF d d Ducky d qhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ |er˭|I|-fGK.rΛp8XV1%K6mvG+tc+qE &ǸC_Nm:l=_/m5^[dߌڇ.c<%:)tQ$Ow~-aY;UJ >=F)2[nk؆?훐 M=l6[4(O.]2#-H^n#->&mp5~Fӛ+|| S,xag% qkEUzUgæBhߕP(7]kFnq?֖Cpru Z6*rEڊtS|*tI*E}7R<,nUU֫^I7Q*mSly%rdȓd8hE<9oHhMfNSRj[i7D[Rj݊+kდq{"$$H?p \̅S?㭻;t~ R߁ )^/>Qj`yt[w ԛ;² ~+ ߔ_ YW~|o] ?x^ᯛ `ʼn;g)T@vWn]>&4l p+$D̢1l|ȨF%-} .9[}w~
ԠLM9hСablfe&QoW !s ?wjLK?s7yO>(=C~_nyǜu? v 3vyo oI@qV-jeES^[9WoSܝh"l2C1a͔CiJ@3:Pճw= /7ovuk+\V;lDgն <[A+r X~d;m!_s8ݖ;;.0llUC+?i#_crʙ1~C.\q u l8Hܶ2m`ܻM3Tov|Bs rɵ"oLS-
DКw=Tv@f '6|YlD͓Y%-#Ѯo%:&!3o%\J<02;K87>^vgƓ# ;ݝmz^Y6=PS39U%~
&f#
}o!muH; ʲŇ˷yvP+&.7e[3'vR4Yj̗IZ`e˽3o[WU{
m[sUbۋZǾۆl6~9'V*.\S2<Sd*zY[aŶ`]C$n.v^Ʌ
dng>ەZ,Mmϑ :n6nϦezW qUJ4! ۇ4R! =>>F n|Q[{pRO 17ƕ~._I ''00k=b՛o}Osðc2'o\3}ݭQ^ 2 . R1yKȣtAݿ-u ܾw!`?1Whn|gzU o[ECWwjUIן)^h#1ɭ!/Z
np;o;ΗŻkXs."6E`Z1
עӐ9Kl8qd q} 2Stt;#j>;խabONŗ=fwP1j)l6J̶|gV 2`y/0E˛6+ԫ1?
6}KW c\KoKͨ2ۅFws*TԞLיuDx .kCzWXhy۶gLu|%TnupǺl-S* P RaLnT+c+*xl.v!.U=|; !_L̎뱚U=4hm:ٯ"y)$:>%(n}X'p[ȴ
^˒4kƓmzDx
\
'Nq amP7nyN݅=
Copyright: © 2018 by the Korean Society of Breeding Science
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
| Cultivar | Flowering datez | Maturity datez | Plant height (cm) | No. of node | No. of blanch | First pod hight (cm) | No. of pod | 100-seed weight (g) | Pod shattering | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||||||
| Field | Ratio by oven test (%) | |||||||||
| Gangpoong | July 27 | Oct. 8 | 67by | 16b | 4b | 15a | 43a | 30.1a | 1 | 5 |
| Daewon | July 24 | Oct. 12 | 81a | 18a | 6a | 12b | 44a | 26.0b | 0 | 0 |
| Cultivar | Excess water (0-9)z | Drought (0-9)z | Lodging (0-9)z |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gangpoong | 4a | 1b | 1by |
| Daewon | 3a | 3a | 7a |
| Cultivar | Bacterial pustule(0-9)z | Soybean Mosaic Virus | Root rot (0-9)z | Purpura (%)x | Pod and stem blight (%)x | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||||
| Inoculationy | Field (0-9)z | ||||||||
| Inoculation | Field | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| G7H | G6H | G5 | |||||||
| Gangpoong | 1 | 1 | -/M | V/N | V/N | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Daewon | 7 | 7 | L/- | L/- | L/- | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
z(0) Tolerant ~ (9) Susceptible
yReaction of inoculated leaf/upper leaves, - : no symptom, L : Local reaction, N : Necrosis, M : Mosaic
xRoot rot and Purpura that were naturally infected in the field were estimated
Science name of soybean disease : bacterial pustule(Xanthomonas axonopdis pv. Glycines), root rot(Calonectria ilicicola), Purpura(Cercospora kikuchii), Pod and stem blight(Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae)
| Cultivar | Crude protein (%) | Crude oil (%) | Fatty Acids(%) | Total | Isoflavone (μg/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Sat. | Unsat. | Glycitein | Daidzein | Genistein | ||||
| Gangpoong | 40.6az | 17.7a | 14.0a | 86.1a | 1,707a | 298a | 523b | 886a |
| Daewon | 37.5b | 18.5a | 12.7b | 87.3a | 1,691a | 236b | 589a | 866a |
| Cultivar | Yield | Physical characteristics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||
| Elasticity | Gumminess | Cohesiveness | Hardness (g/3.14mm2) | Chewiness | ||
| Gangpoong | 213az | 13.0a | 0.08a | 0.28a | 2.9b | 1.1a |
| Daewon | 208a | 12.6a | 0.07a | 0.27a | 2.7a | 0.9b |
| Cultivar | Soybean malt | Fermented soybean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| Degree of fermentation (1-5)z | Yeild (%) | Degree of fermentation (1-5)z | Yield (%) | |
| Gangpoong | 2 | 105ay | 3 | 201a |
| Daewon | 2 | 100b | 3 | 200a |
| Cultivar | Yield(MT/ha) | Index | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
| PYTz(’08) | AYTy(’09) | ATY(’10) | Mean | ||
| Gangpoong | 3.41 | 3.15 | 2.62 | 3.06ax | 115 |
| Daewon | 2.25 | 3.40 | 2.36 | 2.67b | 100 |
| Crop-ping | Location | Gangpoong(MT/ha) | Index | Daewon(MT/ha) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Mean | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Mean | |||
| Mono | Yeonchon | 3.32 | 2.70 | 3.46 | 3.16az | 117 | 2.81 | 2.35 | 2.92 | 2.69a |
| Yangpyong | 2.48 | 2.30 | 3.26 | 2.68a | 116 | 2.15 | 2.08 | 2.73 | 2.32a | |
| Yongin | 2.46 | 2.56 | 3.25 | 2.76a | 110 | 2.15 | 2.42 | 2.96 | 2.51a | |
|
|
||||||||||
| Mean | 2.75 | 2.52 | 3.32 | 2.87a | 114 | 2.37 | 2.28 | 2.87 | 2.51a | |
Qualitative characteristics of ‘Gangpoong’.
| Cultivar | Growth habit | Leaf shape | Flower color | Pod color | Pubescence color | Seed coat color | Cotyledon color | Seed shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gangpoong | Determinate | Oval | White | Yellow | Gray | Yellow | Light Brown | Elongated spherical |
| Daewon | Determinate | Oval | White | Yellow | Gray | Yellow | Yellow | Spherical |
Quantitative characteristics of ‘Gangpoong’ determined by regional yield trial from 2011 to 2013.
| Cultivar | Flowering date |
Maturity date |
Plant height (cm) | No. of node | No. of blanch | First pod hight (cm) | No. of pod | 100-seed weight (g) | Pod shattering | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Field | Ratio by oven test (%) | |||||||||
| Gangpoong | July 27 | Oct. 8 | 67b |
16b | 4b | 15a | 43a | 30.1a | 1 | 5 |
| Daewon | July 24 | Oct. 12 | 81a | 18a | 6a | 12b | 44a | 26.0b | 0 | 0 |
z(0) Tolerant ~ (9) Susceptible
yMean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
The resistance of ‘Gangpoong’ to the water stress and drought of soybean estimated from 2011 to 2013.
| Cultivar | Excess water (0-9) |
Drought (0-9) |
Lodging (0-9) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gangpoong | 4a | 1b | 1b |
| Daewon | 3a | 3a | 7a |
z(0) Tolerant ~ (9) Susceptible
yMean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
The resistance of ‘Gangpoong’ to the diseases of soybean estimated from 2011 to 2013.
| Cultivar | Bacterial pustule(0-9) |
Soybean Mosaic Virus | Root rot (0-9) |
Purpura (%) |
Pod and stem blight (%) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inoculation |
Field (0-9) |
||||||||
| Inoculation | Field | ||||||||
| G7H | G6H | G5 | |||||||
| Gangpoong | 1 | 1 | -/M | V/N | V/N | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Daewon | 7 | 7 | L/- | L/- | L/- | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
z(0) Tolerant ~ (9) Susceptible
yReaction of inoculated leaf/upper leaves, - : no symptom, L : Local reaction, N : Necrosis, M : Mosaic
xRoot rot and Purpura that were naturally infected in the field were estimated
Science name of soybean disease : bacterial pustule(Xanthomonas axonopdis pv. Glycines), root rot(Calonectria ilicicola), Purpura(Cercospora kikuchii), Pod and stem blight(Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae)
Major component of seed in Gangpoong.
| Cultivar | Crude protein (%) | Crude oil (%) | Fatty Acids(%) | Total | Isoflavone (μg/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat. | Unsat. | Glycitein | Daidzein | Genistein | ||||
| Gangpoong | 40.6a |
17.7a | 14.0a | 86.1a | 1,707a | 298a | 523b | 886a |
| Daewon | 37.5b | 18.5a | 12.7b | 87.3a | 1,691a | 236b | 589a | 866a |
zMean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
Characteristics of tofu of ‘Gangpoong’ estimated from 2011 to 2013.
| Cultivar | Yield | Physical characteristics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elasticity | Gumminess | Cohesiveness | Hardness (g/3.14mm2) | Chewiness | ||
| Gangpoong | 213a |
13.0a | 0.08a | 0.28a | 2.9b | 1.1a |
| Daewon | 208a | 12.6a | 0.07a | 0.27a | 2.7a | 0.9b |
zMean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
Soybean malt and fermented soybean process ability by ‘Gangpoong’.
| Cultivar | Soybean malt | Fermented soybean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree of fermentation (1-5) |
Yeild (%) | Degree of fermentation (1-5) |
Yield (%) | |
| Gangpoong | 2 | 105a |
3 | 201a |
| Daewon | 2 | 100b | 3 | 200a |
z(1) Very bad (2) Bad (3) Fair (4) Good (5) Excellent
yMean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
Yield of ‘Gangpoong’ on yield trials carried out at Yoncheon.
| Cultivar | Yield(MT/ha) | Index | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYT |
AYT |
ATY(’10) | Mean | ||
| Gangpoong | 3.41 | 3.15 | 2.62 | 3.06a |
115 |
| Daewon | 2.25 | 3.40 | 2.36 | 2.67b | 100 |
z(PYT) Preliminary yield trial
y(AYT) Advanced yield trial
xMean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
Yield of ‘Gangpoong’ on the regional yield trials carried out at 3 locations.
| Crop-ping | Location | Gangpoong(MT/ha) | Index | Daewon(MT/ha) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Mean | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Mean | |||
| Mono | Yeonchon | 3.32 | 2.70 | 3.46 | 3.16a |
117 | 2.81 | 2.35 | 2.92 | 2.69a |
| Yangpyong | 2.48 | 2.30 | 3.26 | 2.68a | 116 | 2.15 | 2.08 | 2.73 | 2.32a | |
| Yongin | 2.46 | 2.56 | 3.25 | 2.76a | 110 | 2.15 | 2.42 | 2.96 | 2.51a | |
| Mean | 2.75 | 2.52 | 3.32 | 2.87a | 114 | 2.37 | 2.28 | 2.87 | 2.51a | |
zMean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
(0) Tolerant ~ (9) Susceptible
Mean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
(0) Tolerant ~ (9) Susceptible
Mean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
(0) Tolerant ~ (9) Susceptible
Reaction of inoculated leaf/upper leaves, - : no symptom, L : Local reaction, N : Necrosis, M : Mosaic
Root rot and Purpura that were naturally infected in the field were estimated
Science name of soybean disease : bacterial pustule(Xanthomonas axonopdis pv. Glycines), root rot(Calonectria ilicicola), Purpura(Cercospora kikuchii), Pod and stem blight(Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae)
Mean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
Mean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
(1) Very bad (2) Bad (3) Fair (4) Good (5) Excellent
Mean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
(PYT) Preliminary yield trial
(AYT) Advanced yield trial
Mean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
Mean with the same letter in the column are not significantly different by DMRT at 5%.
